Redesigning Digestible IT – UX/UI Designer, Case study

Project Overview

The Product

Digestible IT is a content writing and SEO service website for B2B SaaS and technology companies. It presents Ema’s services, showcases her expertise, and offers solutions to clients’ content challenges.

Preview of the redesigned Digestible IT homepage.

The Problem

The existing website functions mainly as a blog and portfolio, making Ema’s services, expertise, and collaboration process difficult to understand. Potential clients may struggle to identify the right service, assess its relevance, and find a clear path toward requesting a quote.

The Goal

The goal is to create a clear and trustworthy service website that helps B2B SaaS clients understand Ema’s offer, identify the right service, evaluate her expertise and work, and confidently follow a clear path toward requesting a quote.

My Role

UX/UI Designer and UX Researcher

Responsibilities

Stakeholder research, website and competitor analysis, information architecture, ideation, wireframing, visual design, and prototyping.

Research

The research goals were to understand Digestible IT’s business objectives, identify the information potential B2B SaaS clients need when evaluating a content partner, and uncover the main barriers in the current website experience.

Stakeholder Interview

After my initial conversation with Ema, I used an AI tool to help generate and organize stakeholder interview questions. The interview focused on her business goals, target clients, services, current website challenges, and expectations for the redesign. I reviewed and synthesized the answers into key insights that guided the rest of the process.

Existing Website Audit

I reviewed the existing website to understand which content and pages still supported the new business direction. I evaluated each element based on service clarity, trust, relevance, and its ability to guide visitors toward contact. Some parts were retained, others were removed or reduced, and new pages and sections were introduced.

screenshot-figma-website-audit

The audit helped define what to retain, remove, and create for the service-focused redesign.

Competitor Analysis

I selected three independent B2B SaaS content specialists through Google search and reviewed how their websites communicate services, expertise, trust, and calls to action. The goal was not to copy individual layouts, but to identify common patterns and opportunities for Digestible IT.

Three independent B2B SaaS content-service websites.

Key Research Insights

The stakeholder interview and website audit showed that Digestible IT needs to better support Ema’s goal of attracting long-term B2B SaaS clients. The redesign should clearly present her services and target audience, make the three offers easy to compare, highlight selected work and trust signals, connect articles to relevant services, support visitors at different levels of readiness, and provide a clear path toward requesting a quote.

Key Assumed Pain Points

The competitive audit showed that effective service websites present their offer early, clearly define their target audience, and connect services to specific client problems. Competitors organize services into clear categories, build credibility through personal introductions, testimonials, client logos, work samples, and results, and use repeated CTAs and process information to guide visitors toward contact. Their blogs support the service offer rather than dominate the homepage. Digestible IT should adopt these patterns while keeping the structure concise, easy to scan, and focused on its three core services.

Services are not clearly communicated.

The redesign will clearly present each service, its purpose, and the value it provides.

The collaboration process is not clearly explained.

A simple step-by-step process will show visitors what to expect when working with Ema.

Expertise is not clearly demonstrated.

Selected work, testimonials, client experience, and credentials will provide stronger proof and build trust.

The IA does not support conversions.

The new structure will guide visitors from understanding the offer to evaluating Ema’s expertise and requesting a quote.

Proto-persona

To translate the initial assumptions into a clearer user context, I created Laura Mitchell as a proto-persona.

Laura represents a marketing or content lead at a B2B SaaS company who is responsible for maintaining a consistent content strategy despite limited internal capacity. She needs a reliable long-term content partner who can understand the company’s brand voice, create clear and human SEO-focused content, and reduce the workload on her team.

Laura, the target B2B SaaS content lead.

Problem Statement

Laura is a B2B SaaS Marketing/Content Lead who needs a clear and efficient way to understand Ema’s services, evaluate her expertise, and review relevant work because the current blog-focused website does not clearly communicate the service offer, trust signals, collaboration process, or path toward requesting a quote.

Proto-journey

Using Laura’s goals, frustrations, and assumed needs, I mapped her journey from first discovering Digestible IT to understanding the available services, evaluating Ema’s expertise, learning how the collaboration process works, and deciding whether to request a quote. The map highlighted the need for clear service information, visible work samples and trust signals, a transparent process, and a simple inquiry path that supports Laura at each stage of her decision-making.

Laura’s path from discovery to inquiry.

Ideating

How Might I & Rapid Sketcing

During the ideation phase, I used How Might We questions, rapid sketching and AI-assisted brainstorming to explore possible solutions. I evaluated, selected, and refined the strongest ideas, focusing on clear service communication, trust, process transparency, and conversion.

Turning insights into design opportunities.

Restructuring the Experience

The existing information architecture prioritised blog content, while the new business goal required a service-first structure. I reorganized the website around service discovery, trust, and a clear path toward requesting a quote.

Sitemaps

The new sitemap places Services, Selected Work, About, and Request a Quote at the centre of the experience. Blog content remains available, but now supports service discovery rather than dominating the website.

User flow

I mapped Laura’s main path from understanding the offer to reviewing a relevant service, evaluating work and trust signals, and submitting a quote request.

Screenshot of a user flow

Part of the main path toward requesting a quote. Check full user flow here.

Defining the Visual Direction

Logo Redesign

The original logo used a dot between “digestible” and “IT,” which could visually suggest a .it domain even though the website uses .com. I simplified the wordmark by removing the dot and created light and dark versions for use across different backgrounds.

Colour Lesson

While developing the logo, I noticed that the selected bright purple changed significantly when converted from RGB/HEX to CMYK. This taught me that highly saturated screen colours cannot always be reproduced accurately in print. For future print work, I would use the correct colour mode, the printer’s colour profile, and a physical proof.

Moodboard and Visual Style

After defining the logo direction, I created a moodboard that combined a clean SaaS aesthetic with a more approachable and human visual tone. The design uses strong hierarchy, generous white space, dark navy for structure, and purple as the main brand accent.

moodboard-dit

Visual direction for the redesign.

Typography

Inter SemiBold was selected for headings because its strong, modern forms create clear hierarchy and support the B2B SaaS positioning. Roboto Regular was selected for body text because it is neutral, familiar, and easy to read across longer sections.

Colour

I applied a 70–20–10 colour distribution: white as the dominant background, dark navy for structure and readability, and purple for CTAs, links, and key accents. Light lavender supports secondary backgrounds and interface elements.

Designing

Paper Wireframes

I used paper wireframes to explore page hierarchy, section order, CTA placement, and content relationships before moving into visual design. I created alternatives for the homepage and key pages, then refined the strongest ideas into a consistent website structure.

Initial layout ideas on paper. Check all the wireframes here.

Stakeholder Review

I presented the research, information architecture, and paper wireframes to Ema with a focus on functionality and user flow. Her feedback helped refine the page structure, remove unnecessary content, and clarify which information needed greater emphasis.

From Wireframes to Prototype

With the structure approved, I moved into Figma and created the desktop prototype. I used AI-assisted tools to accelerate layout exploration and repetitive production tasks, while manually reviewing the hierarchy, content, components, and final visual decisions.

Screens from high-fidelity static design. Check all pages here.

Screenshot from the prototype. Check the prototype here.

Stakeholder Outcome

I presented the desktop prototype to Ema, who responded positively to the visual direction, clearer service structure, and stronger focus on potential clients. The design phase was successfully completed, and implementation is the next stage of the project.

Accessibility Considerations

Accessibility was considered through readable typography, sufficient contrast, clear interaction states, descriptive labels, and consistent content hierarchy. The form structure was designed to support clear instructions and understandable errors.

Reflection

Accessibility Considerations

This was my first complete UX/UI project after earning the Google UX Design Certificate. It showed me how closely research, information architecture, branding, content, interaction design, and implementation are connected.

I used AI extensively as a support tool for research synthesis, brainstorming, content development, image editing, and rapid prototyping. The main lesson was that speed does not replace design judgement. Every generated result still required review, refinement, and a clear reason for being included.

Let’s talk about your project

Fill out the form below to contact me.